WITHDRAWN Vice Chair Zaletel & Member Volland's Substitute - AO 2024-105 (S-2A)
Assembly Members Daniel Volland and Meg Zaletel proposed a substitute (S-2A) version of the ordinance which would restructure the distribution of revenue from the 3% tax into four quarters dedicated in equal parts to the following:
- Property tax reduction (under the tax cap)
- Up to seven Municipal Area Projects (MAPS)
- General government funding dedicated to public services including public safety, snow fleet replacement and affordable housing and public transit development (outside the tax cap)
- General government funding secured in a trust and prioritized for improving municipal facilities, expanding existing benefits and addressing identified community needs not otherwise adequately funded (outside the tax cap)
This proposal would also provide an exemption for households earning 80% or less of the median Anchorage income (determined by HUD) and increase the municipal tax exemption for business personal property to $250,000.
The S-2A version replaces the S-2 version with changes that call for a special election to consider the proposed ballot prop, as opposed to submitting the question to the voters as part of the regular election in April. Additionally, it clarifies the processes by which the Assembly will submit ballot propositions to the voters every seven years to approve future MAPs projects and to approve purposes for the expenditure from revenues from the dedicated fund. Finally, the S-2 cleans up several drafting errors in the original S-2. As of January 30, Members Volland and Zaletel have withdrawn their proposal from consideration.
Sponsors' Statement
With hope that our community takes the time this effort deserves, we have decided to withdraw our sales tax alternative from further consideration.
Project Anchorage is sparking a worthwhile conversation about how the Municipality captures and dedicates revenue to meet the needs of our community. The Assembly’s role is to craft a ballot proposition with confidence that, if approved by voters, the system could work.
We appreciated the opportunity to meet in a Special Sales Tax Committee meeting earlier this month. This allowed us to work alongside the original Project Anchorage sponsors and raise ideas and concerns, in an effort to find common ground and identify components of the proposal that require additional information to make an informed decision. We look forward to seeing if those ideas and concerns are addressed in any subsequent versions that may be brought forward by the sponsors of the S version.
The Assembly must consider how we make targeted quality-of-life investments in our city, while also acknowledging that many families are struggling to afford to live here. At the core of our alternative, we sought to mitigate the regressivity of a sales tax proposal. Any future proposal should have the same goal.